DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. NR2777-13
30 Jun 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting-in executive session, considered your
application on 30 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 of 14 Apr
14, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
In reviewing your application, the Board noted your statement “I
received a document stating I’m to receive the (NCF) of
$19,000.” The Board noted that the Navy College Fund (NCF) was
erroneously given to you because though it states that you were
“qualified to receive up to $19,000" you in fact did not qualify
to receive such an educational award. Per BUPERSINST 1780.1
series one of the “Qualifications to be Considered for NCF
Guarantee” include “d. Achieved an AFOT score of 50 or higher”.
Your Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFOT) score when you
entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) was 36, 14 points below
the requirement. The Board further noted that though you did
not qualify for the NCF, you qualified for a $2,000 Enlistment
Docket No. NR2777-13
Bonus in accord with the naval message that was effective at
that time, for which you were paid the $2,000 in September 2000.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. ,
it is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable ackion cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and’
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, *the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
seein” tautaeem
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure: CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 of 14 Apr 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10116 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 18 Dec 12 and CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 dtd 25 Apr 13,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10728-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. It is our opinion that in this case the petitioner has a misunderstanding as to how the NCF benefit is calculated.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7220 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of - probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0997 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 of 14 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10043-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to the Navy College Fund (NCF) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08343 12
8343-12 6 Aug 13 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to the Navy College Fund (NCF) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00686-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02225-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser N5312/09051 of 28 May 09, a copy of which is attached. W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Dir Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1133 Ser N5312/09051 28 May 09 MEMORANDUM FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2876 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to the Navy College Fund {NCF) . c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05215-12
5215-12 21 Mar 13 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records ZO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL [RECORD | ICO | Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to the Navy College Fund (NCF) . CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...